FUNCTIONAL
BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT (FBA)
As required by IDEA97 - (Pertains to educational
law in the United States)![]()
-FBA is the process of gathering and analyzing information about the student's behavior and accompanying circumstances in order to determine the purpose or intent of the actions.
-FBA was designed to help us:
-determine the appropriateness of placement
and services
-identify positive interventions to reduce
the undesirable behavior
-develop appropriate behaviors to be substituted
in replacement of the
inappropriate ones.
-FBA is based upon the following assumptions:
-challenging behaviors do not occur
in a vacuum
-behaviors occur in response to an
identifiable stimuli
-behaviors are governed by the consequences
that follow them
-behavior is a form of communication
(we
just need to figure out what it says...
"I am tired.", "I am bored.", "I'm still upset at what happened earlier",
etc.)
-"misbehavior" may actually be adaptive
given the circumstances (e.g., "My teacher
is a ineffective manager of student behavior. S/he can't protect
me from the thugs
in my class. I better misbehave so that the aggressive kids like
me and won't
victimize me.")
-behaviors serve a function &
have a purpose, usually:
-to get something (e.g., attention, money, good grades)
-to avoid/escape something (e.g., punishment, embarrassment)
-The technology for determining the purpose of behaviors has been around and has research support*, but FBA is complicated and time consuming in nature. Costs vs. benefits are questionable.
* The research available
when the U.S. law was passed had been conducted mostly by professors and
their six graduate assistants with severely impaired preschoolers and adults.
It was never (as of the year 2001) conducted with the kids for who it will
now be used. It hadn't been conducted by the professionals now required
to implement it. The process often takes up to six weeks, but now
it might have to be done in 10 days or less.
It will be interesting to see how things work out over the years.
-An FBA must be conducted:
-if behavioral concerns are present (according
to many scholars in education law)
(New York State recommends
FBA as part of pre-referral and referral activities
and IEP development, review,
and revision for misbehaving students. It should
be part of an on-going program,
not used merely an isolated practice for severe
school code violations.)
- within 10 days of an offense punishable by:
-suspension
-removal to an IAES (Interim
Alternative
Educational Setting...a place where kids who have broken
the law or been aggressive can be sent for up to 40 days -- with services
maintained and issues that led to removal addressed)
STEPS FOR CONDUCTING A
FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORAL
ASSESSMENT
(Procedures will vary depending on situation
& student's level of need)
Stage 1 - Hypothesis Development
1. Identify the behavior
& define it in terms that are:
-specific
-observable
-measurable (see the home page link on "Behavioral
Recording" or Activity #1
of "DRO" for explanation and practice)
2. Identify:
-times when student
is:
-most likely to engage in the behavior
-least likely to engage in the behavior
-factors or events that seem to contribute
to student's problem behavior
-specific
immediate events/triggers (the stimulus that sparked the behavior)
-"setting
events" (events that happened a while ago, but lowered the student's
ability to handle the situation...e.g. missing the bus, being threatened
on the way to school)
Accomplish #2 by doing the following:
a.
Interview
knowledgeable individuals about events and circumstances associated with:
-occurrences
-non-occurrences
b.
Conduct
systematic direct observations in natural settings
(guided by an analysis of the indirect information)
-behavioral recording
-frequency recording
-duration/momentary time sampling
(see the page on behavioral recording for
information on these practices)
-scatterplots
| Click here to see an example of a scatterplot |
3. Analyze the information, looking for patterns & indications,
and develop hypotheses
(global & specific) regarding the:
-behavior's function/purpose
-factors (immediate & setting)
affecting the behavior
-physical environment variables
-curriculum, instruction &
work demands
-social interactions &
individuals involved
-biological contributors
-state of mind/emotional influences
*Now place the hypotheses in
writing:
-Describe the relationship between the
behavior and the environment
-Defend the hypotheses with a description
of the data that support them
There are two types of logical explanations or hypotheses:
-specific
-global
Specific hypotheses attempt to:
- explain the function or purpose of the
undesireable behavior
-identify the fast and slow triggers (i.e.,
antecedents and setting events)
Global hypotheses derive from
the information gained during the FBA that provides us with a greater understanding
of the student and the complexity of his/her situation. These global
guesses influence short & long term prevention/remediation efforts.
We look at the broad influences in his/her life that may effect programming
and it's success.
-skills/talents
-health (physical and emotional)
-preferences/likes and dislikes
-daily routines
-relationships with others in his/her life
-general quality of life
Stage 2 - Hypothesis Testing(optional and questionable)
4. Conduct experiments. Verify/revise the hypotheses (regarding
which variables
maintain the undesirable behavior) by manipulating circumstances &
events:
-present different degrees and types of the hypothetical stimulus
-prevent the occurrence of the hypothetical stimulus
-present other stimuli that might have an effect on the behavior
-promote the demonstration of a new, replacement behavior that would
supposedly meet the student's needs as well as the inappropriate behavior
Stage 3 - Behavioral Intervention Plan (BIP)(based on stages 1 & 2)
5. Develop a realistic plan of action in the BIP:
-set goals and
objectives
-describe direct
interventions
-prescribed responses
to displays of problem behaviors
-list replacement
behaviors and how they will be taught
-note changes in
services
-note changes in
placement
Stage 4 - Implementation of the Plan
6. Teach positive (or less negative) alternative behaviors
that will serve the
same purpose(s) as the inappropriate behaviors, and promote their
use.
7. Modify events/circumstances associated with problem behaviors
so that
inappropriate behaviors are no longer prompted or rewarded.
Resources
For more information on conducting a functional behavior assessment
(and a free videotape on how to conduct an FBA), log onto:
http://cecp.air.org/fba/default.htm
OR
http://cecp.air.org/fba/problembehavior/main.htm
Mary McConnell (2001) Functional behavioral assessment. Denver: Love Publishing Co. (Provides a step by step procedure complete with forms.)
Sheldon Braaten (19**). Behavioral objective sequence (assesses competencies of with EBD and provides appropriate behavioral objectives). Available from www.Attainment company.com or 800/651-0954.
http://204.98.1.2/sped/functanal.html
Provides steps for conducting an FBA
Hey! Why
don't we do a functional behavior assessment
on mean teachers? We could figure out why they're doing bad things
to kids and help them change for the better! Wouldn't it be
great if all kids got to witness a teacher who looked like s/he would rather
be in the classroom with them then any other place? Wouldn't
it be great to see more teachers who appeared really excited about teaching?
| Return to the EBD teacher page |
| Fetch Dr. Mac's Home Page |