Introduction Elizabeth Finch Censorship has at least two meanings. In its broadest sense it it refers to suppression of information, ideas, or artistic expression by anyone, whether government officials, church authorities, private pressure groups, or speakers, writers, and artists themselves. It may take place at anytime, whether by punishment of the communicators after dissemination of their messages, so as to deter others from like expression, prior to its widespread circulation, or before an utterance occurs. In its narrower sense, censorship means the prevention by government action of the circulation of messages already produced. These restraints have the effect of limiting the variety that would otherwise be available. There are as many reasons for censorship as there are against it; it is a fear that the expression, if not censored, will do harm to individuals or society as a whole. Obscene material is objectionable because it has the potential to corrupt personal morality or result in deviant behavior. Censorship has been practiced since the beginning of organized cultures. Societies which are most confident of their principles and the loyalty of it's members have a tendency to be more free in terms of censorship because they need not fear the consequences of dissent. In societies whose values are not fully accepted, or where rule is new and rests on shaky foundations, the heaviest forms of censorship have been installed. Though this is uniformly true, even the freest and most secure of nations find some form of censorship neccessary. Although the legal system in the United States has descended from British law, there have been significant deviations, the most dramatic being the written guarantees of freedom of expression embodied in the First Amendment to the Constitution. Historians continue to debate what the nation's founders meant to include when they wrote that there shall be "no law" abridging the freedom of speech or press, but there is agreement that they wished to reject the common law of seditious libel, thus making public officials fair game for criticism, and to create a barrier against prior restraints by government. Writing and print is the oldest form of widespread communication. Writing was once only accessible to the rich and powerful, but the printing press granted the common people with the ability to read books cheaply, and to publish books and pamphlets of their own. With the use of a printing press, anyone had the abililty to record and distribute their ideas. The printed word became a powerful force for democracy and reform. In the past, the musician's right to control his work was not a question. This has begun to change in recent years, however, as the lyrics to popular music have become more explicit and violent. There is much debate about whether a rap group portraying real life in the ghetto, or a heavy-metal band singing about suicide should be protected as artistic expression, or if these songs really influence society, becoming a cause of violence and hate instead of merely an expression of them. Does government censorship of offensive and violent lyrics improve society, or merely control artists who offend the wrong people? Television has become the most popular format for entertainment since its invention earlier this century. We can be entertained and informed by programs on TV. Stations are becoming less restrictive about content on their programs; more violence, profanity, and nudity than ever before are now allowed on TV. This has aroused the concern of parent groups whose lobbying has been somewhat successful in bringing about change. The new V-chip legislation passed by Congress requires all TV manufacturers to install an electronic device that allows parents to set the tolerance levels for violence, profanity, and nudity. The Internet is the fastest growing form of media today. Everyday a growing number of people are getting on the internet. This unfortunately includes people that most of us would rather not be in touch with. On the Internet, we can chat with public figures, or watch our children be stalked. We can find valuable information on politics and society, or find plans for building pipe bombs. The Internet's greatest strength is its greatest weakness, no one controls what is on it. This makes it a powerful tool for democracy, but also a means of access to things deemed too vulgar to be displayed anywhere else. This is behind the governemnt's proposed Communications Decency Act. Almost everybody nowadays believes that the freedom of the media is a prerequisite of a modern democracy, but at the same time, many people are also convinced that the media are turning democratic politics into a branch of showbusiness. In this report we will take a look at the media overall, public opinion , and give examples of the courts course of action with actual cases. (Whether or not we will include a segment on congress and the media is yet to be determined depending on the attendence of our 5th group member.)